HOW OBAMA AND GOOGLE HACKED THE U.S. ELECTIONS
Paul Sperry For THE NEW YORK POST
How Team Obama Hacked The Elections
By Paul Sperry
New revelations have surfaced that the Obama administration abused intelligence during the election by launching a massive domestic-spy campaign that included snooping on Trump officials.
The irony is mind-boggling: Targeting political opposition is long a technique of police states like Russia, which Team Obama has loudly condemned for allegedly using its own intelligence agencies to hack into our election.
The revelations, as well as testimony this week from former Obama intel officials, show the extent to which the Obama administration politicized and weaponized intelligence against Americans.
Thanks to Circa News, we now know the National Security Agency under President Barack Obama routinely violated privacy protections while snooping through foreign intercepts involving US citizens — and failed to disclose the breaches, prompting the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court a month before the election to rebuke administration officials.
The story concerns what’s known as “upstream” data collection under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, under which the NSA looks at the content of electronic communication. Upstream refers to intel scooped up about third parties: Person A sends Person B an e-mail mentioning Person C. Though Person C isn’t a party to the e-mail, his information will be scooped up and potentially used by the NSA.
Further, the number of NSA data searches about Americans mushroomed after Obama loosened rules for protecting such identities from government officials and thus the reporters they talk to.
The FISA court called it a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue” that NSA analysts — in violation of a 2011 rule change prohibiting officials from searching Americans’ information without a warrant — “had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.”
A number of those searches were made from the White House, and included private citizens working for the Trump campaign, some of whose identities were leaked to the media. The revelations earned a stern rebuke from the ACLU and from civil-liberties champion Sen. Rand Paul.
We also learned this week that Obama intelligence officials really had no good reason attaching a summary of a dossier on Trump to a highly classified Russia briefing they gave to Obama just weeks before Trump took office.
Under congressional questioning Tuesday, Obama’s CIA chief John Brennan said the dossier did not “in any way” factor into the agency’s assessment that Russia interfered in the election. Why not? Because as Obama intel czar James Clapper earlier testified, “We could not corroborate the sourcing.”
But that didn’t stop Brennan in January from attaching its contents to the official report for the president. He also included the unverified allegations in the briefing he gave Hill Democrats.
In so doing, Brennan virtually guaranteed that it would be leaked, which it promptly was.
In short, Brennan politicized raw intelligence. In fact, he politicized the entire CIA.
Langley vets say Brennan was the most politicized director in the agency’s history. Former CIA field-operations officer Gene Coyle said Brennan was “known as the greatest sycophant in the history of the CIA, and a supporter of Hillary Clinton before the election. I find it hard to put any real credence in anything that the man says.”
Coyle noted that Brennan broke with his predecessors who stayed out of elections. Several weeks before the vote, he made it very clear he was pulling for Hillary. His deputy Mike Morell even came out and publicly endorsed her in The New York Times, claiming Trump was an “unwitting agent” of Moscow.
Brennan isn’t just a Democrat. He’s a radical leftist who in 1980 — during the height of the Cold War — voted for a Communist Party candidate for president.
When Brennan rants about the dangers of strongman Vladimir Putin targeting our elections and subverting our democratic process, does he not catch at least a glimpse of his own reflection?
What he and the rest of the Obama gang did has inflicted more damage on the integrity of our electoral process than anything the Russians have done. Paul Sperry is the author of “Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington.”
Deeper than simply “rogue CIA/NSA agency” abuse, the Obama Administration abused something far worse: The free will of the public.
You can find a huge number of YouTube movies and white papers, online, about an advertising trick called “Subliminal Messaging”. The bottom line of all of the existing research is that the human mind can easily be tricked into thinking it is doing something out of free will, when, in fact, a political or advertising campaign is tricking your subconscious mind. No matter how smart, or savvy, you think you are, your mind can be tricked into hate, rage, murder or voting intentions by psychological media tricks.
The CIA are experts at using this technique to overthrow governments.
Obama used his financiers Google, Twitter and Facebook to trick the American public into voting for him. His team then tried to use the same media manipulation tricks to put Hillary Clinton in office.
Google supplied the majority of the staff for the Obama Administration. Numerous investigative reports detail how Obama was “Google’s Bitch”. The connections are, by now, obvious. Google, Twitter and Facebook used over $22 billion dollars of psychological warfare tricks and ultra-advanced subliminal messaging to put Obama in office and try to keep him there. Google’s Eric Schmidt is a spy more than anything else.
That is an FEC campaign financing felony law violation of over twenty one billion dollars. In other words, the Obama people never reported the twenty two billion dollars of services that they had Google, Twitter and Facebook expend on rigging DNC campaign interests. That is the largest FEC campaign law violation in history! They broke the law and NOBODY is holding them accountable!
Donald Trump’s “Trump Tower” was bugged to listen to meetings with, not only, Russian diplomats, but also oil industry execs and Peter Thiel’s biggest secrets. Who had the capability to pull that off? That answer is obvious.
We now have absolute, indisputable proof that Google rigged the U.S. elections but the Special Counsel and the top agencies refuse to allow it to be exposed in public investigations. All of the evidence has now been released to all of the transparency organizations and independent media and the public can read it and decide for themselves.
How does Google rig elections? This report describes 1% of the ways (Yes!, This only covers 1% of Google’s vast mental manipulation tricks) that Google’s sociopath bosses use to manipulate the public:
... Sputnik News reported that Google was ... whether or not Google's executives are taking an active interest in elections; all by itself, Google's search ...
How Google Could Rig the 2016 Election. ... it's possible that Google decided the winner of the Indian election. Google's own daily data on ... Sputnik ...
Google can drive millions of votes to a ... There are three credible scenarios under which Google could easily be flipping elections worldwide as you ...
... the power of Google's algorithm to manipulate public opinion is so strong that it can influence up to 10 million undecided voters, ...
How Google Could Rig The 2016 Election. ... it's possible that Google decided the winner of the Indian election. Google's own daily data on election ...
Google and Facebook Under Investigation for Manipulating Elections for Obama and Hillary ... CENTCOM Lies & Google Rigs Elections . ... Sputnik; Technocratic Tyranny ...
for terms that could have hurt Hillary Clinton in the primary elections over the ... SPUTNIK EXCLUSIVE: Research Proves Google ... https: ...
James Risen and Laura Poitras, two journalists who have experienced first-hand the consequences of pissing off the federal government in the course of performing uncompromising investigative journalism, have a story in today’s New York Times revealing a new layer of the NSA’s domestic surveillance activities. Edward Snowden’s leaked documents are the source of the report, which shows that since November 2010, NSA has been mining its vast data collections to “create sophisticated graphs of some Americans’ social connections that can identify their associates, their locations at certain times, their traveling companions and other personal information.”
The policy shift was intended to help the agency “discover and track” connections between intelligence targets overseas and people in the United States, according to an N.S.A. memorandum from January 2011. The agency was authorized to conduct “large-scale graph analysis on very large sets of communications metadata without having to check foreignness” of every e-mail address, phone number or other identifier, the document said. Because of concerns about infringing on the privacy of American citizens, the computer analysis of such data had previously been permitted only for foreigners.
The agency can augment the communications data with material from public, commercial and other sources, including bank codes, insurance information, Facebook profiles, passenger manifests, voter registration rolls and GPS location information, as well as property records and unspecified tax data, according to the documents. They do not indicate any restrictions on the use of such “enrichment” data, and several former senior Obama administration officials said the agency drew on it for both Americans and foreigners. Obama is now thought to have used the data to attack and manipulate U.S. voters in order to rig the elections.
N.S.A. officials declined to say how many Americans have been caught up in the effort, including people involved in no wrongdoing. The documents do not describe what has resulted from the scrutiny, which links phone numbers and e-mails in a “contact chain” tied directly or indirectly to a person or organization overseas that is of foreign intelligence interest.